Woodrow Wilson had some very big flaws, but kudos for:
“If there are
men in this country big enough to own the government of the United
States, they are going to own it; what we have to determine now is
whether we are big enough, whether we are men enough, whether we are
free enough, to take possession again of the government which is our
own.”
―Woodrow Wilson
http://izquotes.com/quote/278653
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Possible Approach to "Tune Out" or Neutralize Money in Politics? A Small Experiment.
I'd like to throw this out as a test project, in case there are any takers, or rather for now, mostly throw it out for comment and criticism to see if it can be taken any further. The general idea is that voters really assume the attitude that we are the hirers of our public servants, and taking the stand that, yes, they are our public servants.
Monday, August 18, 2014
What did Saul Alinsky Really Say?
"I’ve never joined any organization — not even the ones I’ve organized myself. I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it’s Christianity or Marxism. One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as 'that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you're right.' If you don't have that, if you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated. The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to Communist purges and Nazi genocide."
This is one little quote from the guy who, according to the mythical
"8 Principles of Control" or How to create a social state wanted to make the world a totalitarian zombie factory.
Thursday, August 7, 2014
From Natural (or Naturalized) to Social Epistemology
I've been reading an anthology called Naturalizing Epistemology (1986) edited by Hilary Kornblith.
"Naturalizing" epistemology has been heavily identified with W.V.O. Quine (author of the 2 first articles in Naturalizing Epistemology).
Others draw parallels between naturalized epistemology and the much earlier philosophy of pragmatism, or John Dewey in particular, as in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society Vol. 32, No. 4, Fall, 1996, "Dewey, Quine, and Pragmatic Naturalized Epistemology". Or see Stich 1993 "Naturalizing Epistemology: Quine, Simon and the Prospects for Pragmatism". The title alludes to Herb Simon, the Nobel Laureate (Economics), Turing Prize winner, cognitive psychologist, AI pioneer, etc.
Naturalized epistemology, like many other intellectual approaches has a strong and a weak program, or position. The strong might be represented by Quine's "Why not settle for psychology".
"Naturalizing" epistemology has been heavily identified with W.V.O. Quine (author of the 2 first articles in Naturalizing Epistemology).
Others draw parallels between naturalized epistemology and the much earlier philosophy of pragmatism, or John Dewey in particular, as in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society Vol. 32, No. 4, Fall, 1996, "Dewey, Quine, and Pragmatic Naturalized Epistemology". Or see Stich 1993 "Naturalizing Epistemology: Quine, Simon and the Prospects for Pragmatism". The title alludes to Herb Simon, the Nobel Laureate (Economics), Turing Prize winner, cognitive psychologist, AI pioneer, etc.
Naturalized epistemology, like many other intellectual approaches has a strong and a weak program, or position. The strong might be represented by Quine's "Why not settle for psychology".
Labels:
AGW,
Alvin-Goldman,
Descartes,
Dewey,
Naturalizing/Philosophy,
Quine,
Social Epistemology
Thursday, July 31, 2014
A modest search engine proposal
How much AI technique could it possibly take for google (or something better) to do a decent job with
An article: "Bill Ayers and Obama Both Quote Alinsky" claims such quotes exist, but their one attempt to demonstrate it is laughable -- something vaguely like a paraphrase of an Alinsky statement, but which has, in fact the reverse sense of what the supposed "original" meant.
speechby:obama attitude:positive "Saul Alinsky".I.e. "speechby:" and "attitude:" don't exist, but could, I believe be implemented pretty accurately, to see in this case if we can find any instances of Obama praising Saul Alinsky.
An article: "Bill Ayers and Obama Both Quote Alinsky" claims such quotes exist, but their one attempt to demonstrate it is laughable -- something vaguely like a paraphrase of an Alinsky statement, but which has, in fact the reverse sense of what the supposed "original" meant.
Labels:
Disinformation,
Internet,
Obama,
Saul Alinsky,
Search Engines,
Semantic Web
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
"Obama Confession" by Andrew Hodges
I just have to give an example of the strange places some Americans have gone fishing for the truth. Psycho-history once had its day, but that day is long past, except in right wing daemonizations of Obama which are big sellers. If you're tempted to buy this, let me suggest looking at this review of another book by the author called A Mother Gone Bad: The Hidden Confession of JonBenet's Killer Here is one excerpt from the review "he concludes that the misspelled word "bussiness" all by itself indicates that a woman did it because of several random words that he himself, out of the blue, associates with that word. Yes, it really is that bad!" |
Monday, July 14, 2014
Applied Memetics, Godwin's Law, Leo Strauss and Reduction ad Hitlerum
According to Wikipedia, Godwin's law (or Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies) is an Internet adage asserting that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1".
Labels:
David Horowitz,
Leo Strauss,
Memetics,
Reductio ad Hitlerum
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)